What Do You Do When Everyone Has Been Traumatized by 2021?

As they say, the first step in all recovery programs is admitting there is a problem.


No matter what your political views are, you must admit that 2021 was a traumatizing year.  From Covid to the attempt to stop the transition from one President to the next, the unending shootings of people, the exploding acting out people are exhibiting on planes, in meetings and in community.


2021 has been an emotional roller coaster for us all.


Yet, in this past year there have been many who have continued to work to serve our communities from health care to law enforcement to grocery workers to our trash collectors to those of us who work in child and family services.


Everyone has been impacted by the events of the past year. What I have seen is expansive untreated trauma.


Our leaders of organizations who have worked tirelessly to keep our essential services going. In child and family services we have continued to protect our most vulnerable children (as well as seniors and disabled).


Our staff have also worked equally tirelessly to do their jobs and serve our communities’ children and families during the pandemic and the insanity of people’s behavior through the past year.


I hear from staff at all levels how they are burned out  and exhausted by the past year; that they are numb; that they want out.


These words tell us we have an institutional mental health crisis as a result of 2021. We have been traumatized and now need to do trauma recovery while still providing services.  The challenge is figuring out how to do this.


I recommend a senior leadership retreat where a trained trauma recovery specialist facilitate the senior leadership team (1) assessing the level of trauma in the staff including themselves, in the agency’s partners’ and clients (2) and then map out a concrete trauma recovery plan for themselves and the agency’s staff.


The solution is not more time off or more money. Both are nice but do not address the trauma and burnout.


The senior leadership team working with a competent trauma recovery specialist who works at an institutional not a solo client level and helps senior leadership look at options and build concrete plans.


Let me be concrete.


Look at your agency’s turnover for 2021vs 2020. Did it go up or did staff stick with the agency through the year? 


The HR specialists tell us: Some 
65% of employees are looking for a new job right now, according to an August 2021 poll of 1,007 full- and part-time U.S. workers conducted by PwC. That's nearly double the 35% of workers who said they were seeking new work in May.


Are you prepared to lose 1/3 to 2/3 of your staff?


It is less costly in time and money to retain good staff than replace good staff.


That brings me to training your supervisors to be success coaches.  If your supervisors worked with staff in a success-focused model they are more likely to stay than if you supervise staff in a progressive discipline model or don’t individually supervise them on a regular basis at all. Let me be clear, case review is NOT supervision but a different and necessary function. If you don’t know the different then you have an even bigger problem.


Our field will never pay its staff what they are worth, so we have to offer something else to retain our staff.


Decades of studies tell it two-pronged approach:


  • Connect staff to a powerful, positive compelling mission they can buy into.

  • Maximize their success in the job (their direct supervisor’s job)


Both tasks require the agency’s leaders to model and train supervisors how to successfully do both. And that is the content question for the senior leadership planning retreat. 


Let me also be clear – the CEO/President cannot lead this planning retreat nor can any senior leader. The senior staff need to participate as equals in the discussion and planning for the action steps for the agency. They should not be distracted by facilitating the group.


Untreated trauma in adults will interfere with their success with staff and clients.


  1. Step 1: Admit there is a degree of untreated trauma among staff (including senior leadership)

  2. Step 2: Assess the extent of the trauma in your organization

  3. Step 3: Make a agency specific trauma recovery plan

  4. Step 4: Implement the plan

  5. Step 5: At 6 months assess success and make modifications as needed to increase success

  6. Step 6: Repeat step 5 at one year


The need is clear.


What needs to happen is clear.


The question is, Is the senior leadership willing to facilitate trauma recovery for their agency?


LEADING FROM OUTSIDE THE BOX is a monthly newsletter for human services leaders.

Its purpose is to challenge your thinking and help you improve organizational and outcome performance.


To receive your copy free, simply email Jeff Bormaster and ask to be added to the mailing list. Feel free to share these newsletters with other human services leaders, simply include the contact information. 

You can read previous issues of Leading Outside the Box at www.jeffbormasterconsulting.com/topics



Are you a non-profit struggling to recruit and retain a workforce
By Jeff Bormaster 26 Feb, 2024
Is your primary audience for hiring Gen Y and Gen Z, folks under the age of 41?
02 Oct, 2023
Coaching for Success in Human Service Agencies
By Jeff Bormaster 22 Sep, 2023
Its Time To Teach Supervisors How to Supervise Gen Y & Z
By Jeff Bormaster 17 Aug, 2023
Why Can’t We Keep Front-line Workers?
By Jeff Bormaster 15 Jul, 2023
Why Can’t We Retain Line Staff?
By Jeff Bormaster 11 Jun, 2023
Help – We Need Help! The Forever Labor Shortage
By Jeff Bormaster 11 Jun, 2023
Why Can’t We Recruit & Retain Foster Parents
By Jeff Bormaster 11 Jun, 2023
Our systems are all interconnected and interactive, each one nested within the other. In this image we only have four layers of these nested systems but remember that the layer labeled “government, funders, and the public” is itself nested within larger social and global systems. Therefore everything that happens to one system is likely to be reflected in all of the others. The concept of parallel process taken out of the individual context and applied to organizations is a useful way of offering a coherent framework that can enable organizational leaders and staff to develop a way of thinking “outside the box” about what has happened and is happening to their service delivery systems, based on an understanding of the ways in which trauma and chronic adversity affect human function. Parallel process has been defined as what happens when two or more systems – whether these consist of individuals, groups, or organizations – have significant relationships with one another, they tend to develop similar affects, cognition, and behaviors, which are defined as parallel processes …. Parallel processes can be set in motion in many ways, and once initiated leave no one immune from their influence. Clients bring their past history of traumatic experience into the social service sectors, consciously aware of certain specific goals but unconsciously struggling to recover from the pain and losses of the past. They are greeted by individual service providers, subject to their own personal life experiences, who are more-or-less deeply embedded in entire systems that are under significant stress. Given what we know about exposure to childhood adversity and other forms of traumatic experience, the majority of service providers have experiences in their background that may be quite similar to the life histories of their clients, and that similarity may be more-or-less recognized and worked through [2]. The result of these complex interactions between traumatized clients, stressed staff, pressured organizations, and a social and economic environment that is frequently hostile to the aims of recovery is often the opposite of what was intended. Staff in many treatment programs suffer physical and psychological injuries at alarming rates and thus become demoralized and hostile. Their counter-aggressive responses to the aggression in their clients helps to create punitive environments. Leaders become variously perplexed, overwhelmed, ineffective, authoritarian, or avoidant as they struggle to satisfy the demands of their superiors, to control their subordinates, and to protect their clients. When professional staff and nonprofessionally trained staff gather together in an attempt to formulate an approach to complex problems they are not on the same page. They share no common theoretical framework that informs problem-solving. Without a shared way of understanding the problem, what passes as treatment may be little more than labeling, the prescription of medication, and behavioral “management”. When troubled clients fail to respond to these measures, they are labeled again, given more diagnoses and termed “resistant to treatment”. In this way, our systems inadvertently but frequently recapitulate the very experiences that have proven to be so toxic for the people we are supposed to help. Just as the lives of people exposed to repetitive and chronic trauma, abuse, and maltreatment become organized around the traumatic experience, so too can entire systems become organized around the recurrent and severe stress of trying to cope with a flawed mental model based on individual pathology, that is the present underpinning of our helping systems. When this happens, it sets up an interactive dynamic that creates what are sometimes uncannily parallel processes. The result can be seen in the chart below. Bloom and Farragher, Destroying Sanctuary: The Crisis in Human Service Delivery Systems
By Jeff Bormaster 07 May, 2023
Understanding the Role of Residential in Child Welfare
By Jeff Bormaster 09 Apr, 2023
If You Can’t Bribe Them to Stay How Can You Keep Employees?
More Posts

Share by: